Tixati download file seector
If it's really a problem with the drives, it maybe won't even show up on first try. It's not a visual bug that is for sure. I ran into this problem when I used another client as some trackers don't allow Tixati to cross seed a file that had already completed in Tixati. For example. Looking at the distribution of the pieces there is no pattern of missing data. Drive looks okay to me but I have to admit I am no expert in reading this output.
First of all, I already tried replacing all the. Every solution suggested in the forum didn't worked, upgrading Tixati worked for let it start again, but i lost all my configs and transfer history. I already know why Tixati crashed, it was caused by an Hard Disk having some major problem, i'm replacing it, so i was moving all my old torrents to another disk using the Tixati function for move them, but the Hard Disk stopped working in the middle some sector ruined i suppose and Tixati just sopped working.
I could not even force quit the application, i had to restart the PC, but while restarting Tixati every. Which option is more SSD-friendly? The worst for SSD is the full pre-write. Due to how Tixati has an incomplete-pieces folder feature I do not think it matters which of the other two you choose, because it all comes down to OS file caching.
Fast allocation is technically better for other reasons preventing fragmentation. The way flash storage works is that in order to rewrite a single byte, it must first erase a whole internal block and then write it again. So in theory by increasing the file system block size, you reduce the amount of tiny writes and fragmentation and as a result reduce the amount of internal rewrites write amplification.
You can't change the fs sector size without reformatting full erasure of the partition. Yes that's exactly that.
0コメント